Tagged: federal government

Community cancer clinics turning thousands of patients away

Image: Flickr, TipsTimes via Creative Commons,
Image: Flickr, TipsTimes via Creative Commons,

Many U.S. cancer clinics have started to turn away thousands of patients due to the sequester’s cuts to Medicare.

As The Washington Post’s Sarah Kliff reports, some oncologists say the reduced federal funding makes it impossible for community clinics to administer expensive chemotherapy to seniors and remain financially stable. These patients must now seek treatment elsewhere, even as hospitals accepting Medicare beneficiaries grow more overcrowded.

Jeff Vacirca, chief executive of North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates in New York, told Kliff, “If we treated the patients receiving the most expensive drugs, we’d be out of business in six months to a year.” Vacirca said his clinics have stopped administering drugs on which they lose money. His clinics have also ceased to treat one-third of their 16,000 Medicare patients.

Pancreatic cancer patient Harold Rosen, 81, has been receiving chemotherapy at one of Vacirca’s cancer centers, but sequester cuts will soon change that.

“When I first came here, I was afraid to come because everyone’s dying. But everyone here is so pleasant. They smile, they laugh, they care about you. You would never know it’s a place of cancer,” Rosen said to NBC News. Rosen’s physician told him he must start receiving treatment in a hospital.

Vacirca said he is sad to turn away patients like Rosen, but he insists he must.”I have to be financially responsible to be here,” he said. “I owe it to my patients to not go out of business.”

Although Medicare is only facing a 2 percent reduction in funding- much less than other federal programs- oncologists say cancer patients are losing the most.

Seniors’ medications are mostly covered under the optional Medicare Part D. However, cancer drugs must be administered by physicians, and they are paid for by Medicare Part B. Part B covers doctor visits and is facing the sequester’s cuts.

According to Kliff, “The federal government typically pays community oncologists for the average sales price of a chemotherapy drug, plus 6 percent to cover the cost of storing and administering the medication.” But physicians cannot change drug prices, so the 2 percent cut will have to come out of the 6 percent cover charge- “akin to a double-digit pay cut” for clinics.

recent survey of more than 300 oncology practices by the Community Oncology Alliance determined that 72 percent of them will change how they treat Medicare patients if the cuts continue.

The Alliance has pledged to “fight this unjust and devastating cut to cancer care” with an online petition.

A Milliman report shows that half of all U.S. cancer spending is associated with Medicare beneficiaries. Chemotherapy in hospital settings costs the federal government about $6,500 more than treatment in community clinics does. Some of those costs are then handed to patients, who pay another $650.

Will hospitals be able to absorb these patients? The same study shows almost 70 percent of Medicare patients receiving chemotherapy are treated in community clinics. Clinics in Connecticut, New York and South Carolina have already stopped treating patients.

What is the sequester?

In 2011, Congress passed a law stating that if no legislation was passed to reduce the federal deficit by $4 trillion, some $1 trillion in automatic budget cuts would take effect in 2013.

Learn more from the Life Matters Media Newswire:

Dementia more costly than cancer, will become more common

Connecticut assisted suicide bill finally gets a hearing

Illinois lawmaker pushes for medical marijuana bill

Illinois lawmaker pushes for medical marijuana bill

An Illinois sponsor of a medical marijuana measure says he may have enough votes to pass the bill in the Statehouse, the Chicago Tribune reportsRep. Lou Lang, D-Skokie, says his ”nose count” has him near the 60 votes needed for approval of a three-year trial medical marijuana program called the Compassionate Use of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, which would be a first for Ill.

“If members vote their consciences, I’ll have the votes,” said Lang, who fell short a handful of votes last year, although the Senate approved similar previous legislation in 2010.

This season may be different, however, because three dozen lawmakers in the House and Senate are not coming back in the next General Assembly, making them lame ducks, Ray Long reports. “Their votes are more likely to be up for grabs given that they are not expected to face the voters again.”

CBS News reports that advocates of medical marijuana are in Springfield to lobby state lawmakers to approve the use of medical marijuana with strict limitations. The drug would only be prescribed by doctors, in small amounts, to qualifying terminally ill patients or their designated caregivers. Individuals suffering from AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis or a “debilitating medical condition” may qualify.

A qualifying patient or caregiver would only be able to legally possess 6 cannabis plants and 2 ounces of dried usable cannabis during a two-week period.

State Rep. Jim Durkin, R-Countryside, opposes the measure because he fears it will make the drug more available. “Just in the last two weeks in DeKalb, there was a 10-pound traffic stop of medical marijuana that came from Oregon,” Durkin said.

The AP reports that Rep. Jim Sacia, R-Freeport, acknowledges that Lang may have enough votes to pass the measure, but the former FBI agent still plans to fight it. “I just see it as a tremendous mistake,” said Sacia.

Lang may bring the measure to vote this week at the General Assembly. He told the AP that there are ”a whole bunch of people who are wavering.” He will work over the weekend before putting the measure to vote, although he may be close to the 60 votes needed.

Medical marijuana supporters have already won local approval for medical use in 18 states and D.C. Voters in Colorado and Washington chose to legalize marijuana, although, the federal government currently lists marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance, meaning it has no medically accepted use and high potential for abuse.

Learn more from the Life Matters Media Newswire:

Terminally ill opt for less treatment when in communication with doctors

Feeding tubes: Families struggle with the decision